Dissection Technique for Abdominoplasty: A Prospective Study on Scalpel versus handheld electrocautery.
Abstract
Background: Abdominoplasty, colloquially known as "tummy tuck," is a surgical procedure aimed at removing excess skin and fat around the abdomen while strengthening the muscles of the abdominal wall. Numerous recent studies have delved into the comparison between employing a surgical scalpel and handheld electrocautery for dissecting a skin-lipofacial flap, highlighting the variations in complications and the duration of the surgical procedure, given the distinct advantages and drawbacks of each technique.
Aim: The primary goal of this research is to assess outcomes and complications post-complete surgical abdominoplasty by comparing the dissection methods employing a surgical scalpel versus an electrical clipping technique utilizing a unipolar handheld electrocautery device.
Materials and Methods: Informed consent was obtained from participating patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia using the conventional tummy tuck approach. Subjects were randomly grouped into Group A, where skin adipose flap dissection was performed using a surgical scalpel, and Group B, where dissection was executed using electrocautery.
Key variables scrutinized encompassed surgical duration, pain intensity evaluations, daily and overall drainage through the drain, drain removal timing, hospitalization, local and systemic complications (e.g., delayed wound healing, infection, thrombotic incidents), seroma occurrences (including frequency and drained volumes), readmissions, and emergency visits. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was utilized to gauge pain intensity, with subsequent data entry and statistical analysis performed using SPSS Version 26.
Results: Patient ages in the study ranged from 31 to 60 years, with an average BMI of 29.4 among participants. The mean surgical duration was 146.2 minutes in Group A and 117.3 minutes in Group B. Postoperative pain scores averaged 5.5 in Group A and 5.1 in Group B. Daily drainage through the drain measured an average of 57.4 ml in Group A and 75.5 ml in Group B. Seroma formations were reported in one and three patients in Groups A and B, respectively, with varying drainage frequencies and volumes. The main volume of seroma aspiration in group A was 20.6 ml, and 45 ml in group B.
Conclusion: Employing a surgical scalpel for dissection mitigates seroma occurrence, reduces drainage rates, and alleviates postoperative pain severity. Meanwhile, handheld electrocautery dissection aids in minimizing surgical duration, cost reduction, procedural complexities, and intervention rates, albeit with potential complications like bleeding.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the right to publish in the magazine for the first time with the transfer of the commercial right to Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series
Under a CC BY- NC-SA 04 license that allows others to share the work with of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can use a copy of their articles in their scientific activity, and on their scientific websites, provided that the place of publication is indicted in Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series . The Readers have the right to send, print and subscribe to the initial version of the article, and the title of Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Health Sciences Series Publisher
journal uses a CC BY-NC-SA license which mean
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.